OPERATIONS / MANAGEMENT REPORTING / 2016 — 2020
Splitting one P&L into two operating lines
I separated new-book growth from the legacy portfolio so management could distinguish investment, maintenance, and true operating performance.
What had to be made clear
Create a management view that preserved accounting integrity while making the two operating engines visible and accountable.
Where I carried the decision
I designed the allocation logic, reporting bridge, and review cadence for the dual-track management view.
How the work moved from judgment to execution
01 Defined the boundary between new and legacy assets.
02 Allocated revenue, cost, risk, and collections using consistent rules.
03 Built a bridge from statutory reporting to management reporting.
04 Added cohort, profitability, and collection views for each operating line.
05 Used the split to guide resource allocation and portfolio decisions.
What entered the operating system
↳ Dual-track management P&L
↳ New / legacy allocation rules
↳ Profitability and collection bridge
↳ Operating review pack
BEYOND THE RESULT
See the method in the system at work
This case is one part of a wider finance-and-AI practice. Explore the prototypes that make the underlying logic tangible.